Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 84.5 2-Core 169 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 325 43% 325 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 8428) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.09% Terrible	Lighting 9.2 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 12.8 8% 11.3 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 9.6 Splatting 10.8 9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.09% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 111 22 50 100 24 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.7% Below average	Read 135 Write 88.1 Mixed 77.6 SusWrite 76.7 21% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 22.3 77% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 55 DQ Mixed 27 24% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.3 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1x

RAM
99U5471-050.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 1,731 samples	2x
99P5471-033.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 805 samples	2x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,467 samples	1x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $199

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16