| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Viglen DQ67SW (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Intel DQ67SW |
| Memory | 2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170601 |
| Uptime | 13.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 23 '19 at 20:18 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 80% |
PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.8%
Below average
|
40% 64.6 Pts
|
16% 121 Pts
|
8% 130 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.2%
Poor
|
27% 30.5 fps
|
27% 33.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team T253LE120G 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 55 53 37 38 11 MB/s
|
23.8%
Poor
|
15% 67 MB/s
|
48% 16.2 MB/s
|
98% 128 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$33
54GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 82 91 84 74 MB/s
|
41.6%
Average
|
47% 64.1 MB/s
|
117% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
26.4%
Poor
|
27% 9.4 GB/s
|
18% 6.37 GB/s
|
30% 136 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 422 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Viglen DQ67SW
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $184Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 145x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 108x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 48x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 33x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 22x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $271 |