HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProLiant ML350p Gen8  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory92.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 12:40
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 119
51% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 361
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 39.9
25% 33.9 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 32.1
30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 122 80 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.6% Poor
Read 134
Write 99.8
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 108
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 12.2
53% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 15
11% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 90%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 3.54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 185 185 185 184 185 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 6x16GB
6 of 24 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.8
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350p Gen8 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 237% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback