Asus H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180326
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '21 at 10:30
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 105 2-Core 204 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 380 49% 372 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.7% Above average	Lighting 62.2 Reflection 65.1 Parallax 60.1 51% 62.5 fps	MRender 63.7 Gravity 64 Splatting 59.1 51% 62.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 150 38 58 7.6 51 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 455 Write 357 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 90.2 51% 232 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 9 61% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 0.9 60% 140 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 230GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 137 137 133 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 138 Write 132 Mixed 66.9 SusWrite 129 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 387GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 117 116 115 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 114 Write 111 Mixed 76.1 SusWrite 112 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-069.A00LF 99U5584-014.A00LF 12GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 11.8 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $57

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	461x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	302x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	201x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	173x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	138x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $294

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16