Medion MR Prof. i72000/B668

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MR Prof. i72000/B668  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 21:33
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 215
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 635
65% 527 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Elitegroup(1019 1028) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 20.4
17% 19.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 24 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41% Average
Read 387
Write 68.2
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 24.2
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 16.9
66% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 27.2
36% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 151 153 153 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 141
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 152
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MR Prof. i72000/B668 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MR Prof. i72000/B668

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback