ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Nitro AN515-55 (all builds)
Motherboard	CML Stonic_CMS
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210819
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '21 at 13:21
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 87.2 1-Core 141 2-Core 275 92% 168 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 853 83% 680 Pts	64-Core 1,051 65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 34,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Acer(1025 143E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	42.2% Average	Lighting 52.4 Reflection 53.6 Parallax 50.4 43% 52.1 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 47.8 Splatting 43.2 41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB 12,303 User benchmarks, average bench 169% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21103900 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 919 Write 1,577 Mixed 1,097 270% 1,198 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 54.6 185% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 760 DQ Write 574 DQ Mixed 655 493% 663 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 217%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 628GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 110 110 109 111 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 84.1 Write 83.5 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 109 116% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HM641JI 640GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 435GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 81.9 Write 35.8 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 81.6 81% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB 37,566 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 23.3 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 26.1 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 16,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	12,337x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	3,637x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	42x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	8,456x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples	1,612x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	1,543x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 169%, 12,303 samples	2,473x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBWDCBench 167%, 6,790 samples	2,168x
WDC PC SN530 SDB 512GBNvmeBench 156%, 3,698 samples	1,655x

RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples	2,340x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples	1,715x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	1,632x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback