Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210819
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 13:21
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 275
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 853
83% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,051
65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 143E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.2% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 50.4
43% 52.1 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 43.2
41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 919
Write 1,577
Mixed 1,097
270% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 54.6
185% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 574
DQ Mixed 655
493% 663 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 217%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
628GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 110 110 109 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 84.1
Write 83.5
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 109
116% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HM641JI 640GB
435GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 81.9
Write 35.8
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 81.6
81% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 23.3
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 26.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 16,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback