Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 06:51
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 170
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 323
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 145 136 124 128 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 327
Write 193
Mixed 221
SusWrite 132
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 28.7
103% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 179
146% 207 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
304GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 89 82 87 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 84.7
Write 83.7
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 87.4
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 500GB
175GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 25 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.52% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 17.7
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 24.7
27% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
15% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.52%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown T2G88U1-P9H 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-HD3 Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback