MSI J1800I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7877
MotherboardMSI J1800I  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime26.2 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 23:04
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 43.9
29% 40.8 Pts
4-Core 44.4
8-Core 45.1
6% 44.8 Pts
64-Core 46.4
3% 46.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
MSI(1462 7877) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$60
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 48 55 70 87 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.8% Below average
Read 232
Write 201
Mixed 191
SusWrite 87.7
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 9.8
47% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 83.8
DQ Mixed 6.2
29% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.5
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J1800I Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI J1800I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback