Colorful C.A58T PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardColorful C.A58T PRO  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 13:39
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 101
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 174
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 21.4
18% 20.6 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 17.2
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VD0R0181
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 176 172 179 175 171 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.3% Average
Read 134
Write 178
Mixed 150
SusWrite 172
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 23.6
83% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 29.8
26% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 9905403-02X.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.9% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C.A58T PRO Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Colorful C.A58T PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback