Biostar A68MHE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A68MHE  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 08:44
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 106
44% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 179
20% 159 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PwrHis(1787 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 30.9
18% 26.3 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 20
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Flash War SSD S520 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 234 22 65 11 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 333
Write 309
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 74.3
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.2
20% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
258GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 194 195 196 197 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 153
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 195
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 108%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF GMT8G04UCL116P-PBC 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68MHE Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68MHE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback