Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '21 at 11:16
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 68.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 203 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 610 62% 503 Pts	64-Core 603 37% 603 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 10CF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.8.2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Lighting 59.6 Reflection 62.9 Parallax 51.8 49% 58.1 fps	MRender 42 Gravity 51.8 Splatting 50.1 40% 48 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 912 968 568 478 426 427 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 1,080 Write 557 Mixed 1,010 SusWrite 630 183% 819 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 49.9 161% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 464 DQ Write 550 DQ Mixed 618 435% 544 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 181%
Hitachi HTS541010G9SA00 100GB-$50 408 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 3GB free Firmware: MBZOC60P SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 31 31 31 33 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 24.4 Write 25.6 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 31.5 18% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 27 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 32.4 SC Mixed 23.5 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	120	17.3"	1280 720	AUO479D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	246x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	244x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	211x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	144x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	135x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	267x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	111x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	20x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	90x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	84x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16