Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 02 '21 at 11:36
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 54.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 199 66% 122 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 500 51% 414 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 10CF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44% Average	Lighting 57.2 Reflection 62 Parallax 51.2 47% 56.8 fps	MRender 41.9 Gravity 51 Splatting 48.8 39% 47.2 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 857 859 578 750 552 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 169 Write 373 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 727 76% 333 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 23.7 50% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 397 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 54.9 93% 189 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 181%
Hitachi HTS541010G9SA00 100GB-$50 408 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 3GB free Firmware: MBZOC60P SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 29 30 31 30 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 27.1 Write 32.4 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 29.7 20% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.1% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 26.9 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 20.5 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	120	17.3"	1280 720	AUO479D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	246x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	244x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	211x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	144x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	135x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	267x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	111x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	20x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	90x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	84x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16