Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-DS2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170706
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '21 at 04:49
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4400-$45 36,432 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 74.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 209 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 213 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B 326B) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.07% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 3.8 3% 4.3 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.07% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 88 81 80 69 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 457 Write 320 Mixed 93.1 SusWrite 112 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 23.7 74% 158 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 232GB free Firmware: HP11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 119 121 122 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 24.8 Write 14.3 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 121 34% 46.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GLLF62F-D8KFG4------ Kingston 9905713-019.A00G 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.9% Good	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 20.2 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 19.9 60% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 92.1 43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23"	1280 720	ACI23C4 ASUS VC239HE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	360x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	292x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	213x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	305x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	169x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	145x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	116x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	45x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	31x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16