HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 204%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8509
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 03:56
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 305
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,192
106% 896 Pts
64-Core 1,585
98% 1,585 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
EVGA(3842 3953) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 281
Parallax 303
241% 293 fps
MRender 336
Gravity 246
Splatting 184
201% 255 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 202%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1038 937 816 817 818 817 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,382
Write 1,497
Mixed 1,248
SusWrite 874
281% 1,250 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 66.1
220% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1014
DQ Write 919
DQ Mixed 947
716% 960 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 220%
Great: 247%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
354GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 384 453 454 455 455 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 445
Mixed 427
SusWrite 409
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 50
163% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 330
248% 333 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
SHGP31-1000GM-2 1TB
225GB free
Firmware: 41060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1772 1401 1646 1748 1294 999 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,426
Write 2,286
Mixed 1,474
SusWrite 1,477
429% 1,916 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 78.3
257% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,238
DQ Write 947
DQ Mixed 1,036
790% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 316%
Great: 414%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
717GB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 159 161 158 159 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 149
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 157
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X KHX2666C16/8G HP26D4U9S8ME-8X KHX2666C16/8G 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 25.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 26.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $881
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback