MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive398% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 23:26
Run Duration398 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 157
2-Core 311
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,021
99% 811 Pts
64-Core 1,472
91% 1,472 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 102%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Gigabyte(1458 4071) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 118
Parallax 143
111% 132 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 104
Splatting 90
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3404 3413 991 769 765 763 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 3,043
Write 3,389
Mixed 3,036
SusWrite 1,684
628% 2788 MB/s
4K Read 86.2
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 120
393% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1441
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 1,148
851% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 398%
Great: 442%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
410GB free
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1659 1700 1159 470 476 481 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,464
Write 1714
Mixed 1,544
SusWrite 991
374% 1,678 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 68.8
232% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 1,170
DQ Mixed 1139
830% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 277%
Great: 332%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
211GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 456 455 397 133 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 460
Mixed 436
SusWrite 331
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 33.6
161% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 48.6
103% 206 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 101%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MK3265GSXN 320GB
468GB free
Firmware: GH101M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 22 22 23 22 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 85.4
Write 88
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 23.5
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 48%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
426GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 23 23 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 150
Write 99.1
Mixed 34
SusWrite 22.7
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 36.1
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.8
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.3
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 8R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 9% 90 35 28 60 26" 1280 720 AAA0000 HDTV
History: Score 25: 5R 0G 0B | Score 36: 7R 0G 1B | Score 20: 4R 0G 0B | Score 40: 8R 0G 0B
Typical B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 6,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback