Advantech DS-280

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAdvantech DS-280  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 10:27
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 164
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 301
42% 308 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.4 fps
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SQF-S25M2-64G-BTA 64GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMA010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 79 77 98 93 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.9% Very good
Read 455
Write 297
Mixed 313
SusWrite 103
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 30.8
133% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 178
156% 231 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M428031 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.5% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 4R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 4% 134 66 47 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0D42 SAMSUNG
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 9: 0R 2G 3B | Score 24: 4R 1G 1B
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback