Asus M4N68T-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T-M  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 16:20
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 255
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 8.5
2-Core 30.4
26% 33.4 Pts
4-Core 54.5
8-Core 66.2
8% 60.3 Pts
64-Core 71.3
4% 71.3 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 20.5
17% 19.8 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 0.3
11% 15.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S SD S800 120G 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RS73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 15 8.8 12 16 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 66.3
Write 24.3
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 15.2
7% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 4
33% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 25.6
DQ Mixed 7.5
10% 19 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 50%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
34GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 54 54 55 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 53.1
Write 40.7
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 53.4
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
18GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 90 97 72 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 77.7
Write 78
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 80.2
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.1
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.9
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 4R 7G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 20% 95 190 42 60 17" 1280 1024 SAM01B7 SyncMaster
History: Score 45: 6R 2G 9B | Score 49: 4R 7G 8B
Typical M4N68T-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback