Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120410
Uptime8 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 10:56
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 189
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 548
54% 443 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 38.2
30% 38.4 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 27
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 66 59 62 55 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 452
Write 428
Mixed 336
SusWrite 88.4
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 36.1
123% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 216
198% 304 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
133GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 274 274 274 273 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 290
Mixed 324
SusWrite 294
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 38
130% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 223
205% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 173 173 174 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 128
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 172
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 993982 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 31
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ7F50 ZOWIE RL LCD
Typical RAMPAGE IV FORMULA Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - $714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback