Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful DJ C.A320M-K PRO
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 01:02
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 196
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 784
69% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.3% Very good
Lighting 90.3
Reflection 88.8
Parallax 82.2
74% 87.1 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 79.4
Splatting 72.6
70% 87.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 360GB 360GB
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 906XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 410 428 430 435 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 489
Write 422
Mixed 363
SusWrite 406
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 18
100% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 99.9
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 23.8
74% 153 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
579GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 90 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 88.4
Write 66
Mixed 50
SusWrite 88.4
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 32
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 27.7
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 240 27" 1280 720 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback