ECT One Computer Core i7-4790K, 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemECT One Computer Core i7-4790K, 4  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 298
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,018
96% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Zotac(19DA 2503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 182
Parallax 207
155% 193 fps
MRender 244
Gravity 197
Splatting 158
159% 200 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 145%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 297 303 285 300 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 378
Write 227
Mixed 230
SusWrite 296
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 29.1
101% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 195
178% 271 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
177GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 435 441 391 451 456 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 414
Mixed 378
SusWrite 436
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 48.2
149% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
117GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1489 1445 1488 1262 1540 831 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,270
Write 1,660
Mixed 1,505
SusWrite 1,342
327% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 67.3
218% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 1,547
DQ Write 1209
DQ Mixed 1,269
979% 1,342 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 262%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 29.3
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 26.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 144 27.7" 1280 720 ACR0637 Acer XB271H A
Typical One Computer Core i7-4790K, 4 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: ECT One Computer Core i7-4790K, 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback