bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110120
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 05:38
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 660
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 132
55% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 212
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 23.5
20% 23 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 18.8
19% 24 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 41 19 74 70 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 98.7
Write 90
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 53.4
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
894GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 104 104 102 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 9.4
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 103
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%
1GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.7 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 7.9
Mixed 9.4
SusWrite 8.7
15% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
27% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3X13332G 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback