Lenovo 3209C54

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 3209C54  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120807
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 11:34
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 104
48% 77 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 222
33% 239 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 16.9
13% 16.2 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 17.3
Splatting 17.1
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 98 73 70 59 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 225
Write 203
Mixed 177
SusWrite 86.3
129% 173 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 4.2
777% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 160%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
173GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 120 122 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 108
Write 85.8
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 121
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030MN68F9F1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 4R 4G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 43% 44 128 58 60 21.3" 1680 1050 KGN0960 KAMN24F7CSA
History: Score 35: 3R 4G 8B | Score 43: 4R 4G 11B
Typical 3209C54 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3209C54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback