IT PA70Hx

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	IT PA70Hx (all builds)
Motherboard	IT PA70Hx
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170623
Uptime	11.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '21 at 07:00
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 68.6 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 190 67% 119 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 521 54% 436 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Clevo(1558 67B1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	2.8% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 5.9 4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.8% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 67B1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.54 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.5% Average	Lighting 57.7 Reflection 70 Parallax 60.7 47% 62.8 fps	MRender 64.2 Gravity 61.1 Splatting 62.6 51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 242 212 211 220 240 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 392 Write 236 Mixed 340 SusWrite 232 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 25 104% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 313 229% 299 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 98%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 164GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 405 397 406 416 429 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 404 Mixed 357 SusWrite 396 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 49.5 169% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 333 251% 336 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%
Lacie P9227 Mobile 4TB 565 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2GB free Firmware: 1153 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29.1 Write 59.7 Mixed 34.2 31% 41 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 156% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 5,996 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 72GB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 104 107 107 106 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 58.4 Write 106 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 101 61% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.6 162% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 69%
Lacie Mobile Drive 5TB 393 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1TB free Firmware: 0003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 39 40 40 40 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 22.4 Write 37 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 38.4 24% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.5 137% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB 4,876 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 6GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.7 4.8 4.8 5.1 5.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	6.85% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 8.7 Mixed 7 SusWrite 5 12% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.9 99% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.85% Great: 14%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB 2,637 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2TB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 2.1 0.5 1.5 2.2 2.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	7.1% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 0.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 1.5 6% 6.35 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.1% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GB 1,275 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.1% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 11.7 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	17.3"	1280 720	LGD056D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PA70Hx Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: IT PA70Hx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	2x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	1x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,275 samples	1x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GBCorsairBench 46%, 73 samples	1x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 2x16GBCrucialBench 74%, 808 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $85

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369