Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_D509DJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_D509DJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509DJ
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 19:05
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 29.2
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 126
37% 71 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 403
38% 316 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 14CF) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 4.4
3% 7.43 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 792 574 487 394 389 403 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 953
Write 993
Mixed 959
SusWrite 506
192% 853 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 47.4
144% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 441
325% 431 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 133%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 13.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 6
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 260
15% 260 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 9 53 4 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN15F5
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_D509DJ Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_D509DJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback