In-sing K14J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemIn-sing K14J  (all builds)
MotherboardIn-Sing K14J
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 06:28
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 100
2-Core 186
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 389
44% 346 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Intel(8086 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.4 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 72 57 56 59 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,393
Write 922
Mixed 868
SusWrite 118
183% 825 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 79.2
288% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 218
248% 412 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 174%
Great: 209%
Sandisk Extreme Pro 55AF 1TB
615GB free
Firmware: 1085
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 39 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.7% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 36.8
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 39.1
9% 38 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 14.4
47% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 20.7
DQ Mixed 22.2
17% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NUD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE0791
Typical K14J Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: In-sing K14J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback