Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 79.6 2-Core 153 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 376 39% 315 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 21D0) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.7% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.7% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB 5,641 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 254 154 82 97 223 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	65% Good	Read 398 Write 131 Mixed 360 SusWrite 178 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 24.2 76% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 164 166% 268 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown S939A2SGS-ITR 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.6% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 11.1 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	5x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	4x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	2x

SSD
MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 2,164 samples	2x
HG6 128GBToshibaBench 79%, 5,641 samples	2x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBSO8G1600CL11LBench 24%, 7 samples	3x
S939A2SGS-ITR 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 12GBUnknownBench 32%, 2 samples	2x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 44%, 3,343 samples	2x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $315

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16