| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-USB3-B3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110331 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 26 '21 at 11:34 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2300
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
69.2%
Good
|
64% 108 Pts
|
41% 306 Pts
|
19% 307 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.2%
Poor
|
27% 35.4 fps
|
25% 31.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 230 232 233 233 237 MB/s
|
70.7%
Very good
|
52% 233 MB/s
|
123% 39.6 MB/s
|
144% 195 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
122GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 70 71 71 72 71 MB/s
|
44.6%
Average
|
54% 73 MB/s
|
172% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 2621 2TB
407GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 77 78 77 78 77 MB/s
|
43.6%
Average
|
99% 74.9 MB/s
|
164% 1.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
29.9%
Poor
|
27% 9.37 GB/s
|
28% 9.7 GB/s
|
56% 71.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 10 | 8 | 60 | 18.5" | 1280 720 | ACR006D V193HQ |
Typical GA-H61M-USB3-B3 Builds (Compare 190 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-USB3-B3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $178Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 35x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 30x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 30x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 27x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 15x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $206 |