Gigabyte GA-H61M-USB3-B3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-USB3-B3  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 12:57
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 156
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 299
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 224 220 221 230 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.4% Good
Read 256
Write 228
Mixed 210
SusWrite 222
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 28.6
103% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 177
139% 191 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
116GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 119 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 72.5
Write 74.7
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 119
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 70%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
417GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 94 91 93 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 80.9
Write 115
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 93.1
124% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
164% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 10R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 62% 16 327 256 60 0" 1366 768
Typical GA-H61M-USB3-B3 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-USB3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback