MSI MS-16W2

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Micro-Star GF65 Thin 10UE
Motherboard	MSI MS-16W2 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210514
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 04:25
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 195 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 595 58% 478 Pts	64-Core 767 48% 767 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 12F2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.2% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 111 Parallax 106 87% 108 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 91.9 Splatting 77.4 76% 94.7 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 105%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB 20,980 User benchmarks, average bench 135% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 92 63 107 68 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 872 Write 921 Mixed 806 SusWrite 153 154% 688 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 89.9 4K Mixed 46.8 152% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 510 DQ Mixed 399 304% 402 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 203%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB 38,732 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.7% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 23.8 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 21.8 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 56: 6R 5G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
56%	51%	43	249	121	60	27.2"	1536 864	BNQ7F7E BenQ EX2710

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-16W2 Builds (Compare 4,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 68%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W2

CPU
Core i5-10500HIntelBench 80%, 12,921 samples	2,506x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	1,896x
Core i5-10200HIntelBench 73%, 5,051 samples	340x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	2,623x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	2,024x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples	143x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	1,966x
OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GBKingstonBench 135%, 20,980 samples	1,064x
MZVLQ1T0HALB-00000 1TBSamsungBench 147%, 3,116 samples	180x

RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	719x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	570x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	388x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16