Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 03:07
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 155
2-Core 306
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 962
91% 756 Pts
64-Core 1447
90% 1447 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 148
Parallax 151
128% 152 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 123
Splatting 106
103% 129 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 115%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 263 263 265 267 268 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 472
Mixed 382
SusWrite 289
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 39.5
147% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 342
256% 340 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 104%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
376GB free
Firmware: P2CR012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1368 1243 407 414 405 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1235
Write 1,138
Mixed 1,370
SusWrite 710
251% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 77.8
277% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,249
DQ Write 974
DQ Mixed 1,152
851% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 228%
Great: 253%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
111GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 160 159 159 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 104
Write 98.9
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 159
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
150GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 86 88 88 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 88.2
Write 116
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 83.1
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Portable 2TB
482GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 101 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47% Average
Read 63.9
Write 70.2
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 99.6
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 33.6
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 34.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM775C LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback