Ciara Q87M-EA

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Ciara Q87M-EA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190322
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 03:11
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 212 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 553 58% 465 Pts	64-Core 590 36% 590 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.3% Average	Lighting 58.7 Reflection 69.5 Parallax 69 48% 65.7 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 60.5 Splatting 53.9 49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 54%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32 20,238 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 201 79 91 69 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 150 Write 214 Mixed 326 SusWrite 114 46% 201 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 34.5 139% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 187 166% 248 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD32G13332 1302 PSD32G13332 1302 PSD32G133381 1302 PSD32G133381 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.6% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.3 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 48: 8R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
48%	22%	54	292	207	60	32"	1280 720	BBY0000 NS-22D510NA19

History: Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 29: 2R 5G 4B | Score 48: 8R 2G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-EA Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Ciara Q87M-EA

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	10x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	2x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	2x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	2x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
X400 256GBSanDisk $29Bench 76%, 2,279 samples	2x

RAM
9905471-084.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 1,260 samples	5x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 2x4GBCrucialBench 52%, 3,884 samples	2x
9905471-084.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 57%, 125 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $303

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359