Asrock A520M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock A520M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 15:22
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 271
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 743
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
PNY(196E 138F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2272 MHz, MLim: 4010 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 122
Parallax 140
110% 132 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 107
Splatting 90.6
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 278 259 276 277 257 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,570
Write 1,001
Mixed 1,198
SusWrite 293
226% 1,016 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 65.4
207% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 752
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 294
289% 472 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 171%
Great: 214%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
589GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 74 72 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 87.4
Write 85.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 73.1
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 54%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
736GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 91 89 85 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 58.7
Write 92.1
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 90.1
57% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MR[ABC]4U400JNNM8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37.1
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 30.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback