TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock A520M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock A520M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 08:25
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 266
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 713
69% 568 Pts
64-Core 945
58% 945 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 80%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
PNY(196E 138F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 112
Parallax 115
104% 118 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 96.5
Splatting 83.3
84% 105 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 97.1%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 259 243 251 249 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 976
Write 271
Mixed 304
SusWrite 253
99% 451 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 30.8
113% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 64.3
114% 228 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 214%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
624GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 72 85 87 91 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 87.4
Write 64
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 84.7
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 49.4%
 Great: 54%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
737GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 90 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 61
Write 95.1
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 91.5
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 43.9%
 Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MR[ABC]4U400JNNM8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 36.3
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 29.7
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 90.7%
 Great: 135%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 66: 9R 6G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
66% 46% 39 245 191 75 23.8" 1920 1080 HLA2380 M40
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A520M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-ITX/ac

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples71x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD  $119Bench 86%, 14,368 samples55x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples45x
GPU
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples45x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples24x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $287Bench 90%, 645,160 samples20x
SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples14x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD  $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples10x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples26x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples19x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples8x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback