TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Ciara DQ67SW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCiara DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120210
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 15:10
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 334
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 74.5%
 Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Zotac(19DA 3255) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.7% Below average
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 47.2
30% 39 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 46.1
Splatting 37.2
36% 44.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 31.7%
 Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 Pro 512GB-$66
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0308D_H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 354 398 420 408 428 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 460
Write 400
Mixed 377
SusWrite 396
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 31.7
102% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 99.2
134% 245 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 88.7%
 Great: 120%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
920GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 372 421 440 437 451 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 1.3
Write 193
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 418
36% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 0.8
30% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2.4
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 1.6
53% 117 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 41.6%
 Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KP223C-ELD CT25664BA1339.C8F1 KP223C-ELD CT25664BA1339.C8F1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Ciara DQ67SW

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel  $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples7x
Core i7-2600Intel  $137Bench 67%, 185,630 samples2x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples3x
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples2x
GTX 770Nvidia  $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples1x
SSD
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples2x
P3-64 64GBBench 56%, 50 samples1x
MZ7TD128 128GBSamsungBench 52%, 54 samples1x
RAM
99U5458-005.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 511 samples3x
SKIHOTAR-4GB-1600 4x4GBUnknownBench 51%, 36 samples2x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback