Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	71% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX516PE
Memory	15.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210721
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 19:26
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11370H 12,227 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 68.4 1-Core 178 2-Core 341 102% 196 Pts	4-Core 586 8-Core 777 87% 682 Pts	64-Core 778 48% 778 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 13DC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Lighting 29.1 Reflection 28.2 Parallax 31.1 24% 29.5 fps	MRender 25.4 Gravity 38.4 Splatting 21.6 23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 20%
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop) 35,839 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Asus(1043 13DC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3060 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.35 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71% Very good	Lighting 94.3 Reflection 86.4 Parallax 86.8 77% 89.2 fps	MRender 78.2 Gravity 73 Splatting 68.8 60% 73.3 fps
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB 7,990 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1165 727 177 128 209 230 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 1,338 Write 1,245 Mixed 1162 SusWrite 439 234% 1,046 MB/s	4K Read 46.2 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 65.3 219% 78.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,128 DQ Write 421 DQ Mixed 902 633% 817 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 253%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 3200, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.5% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 20.2 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 17.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 47: 7R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
47%	36%	42	289	196	60	15.5"	1920 1080	BOE090F

History: Score 33: 4R 3G 4B | Score 47: 7R 2G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE

CPU
Core i7-11370HIntelBench 74%, 12,227 samples	787x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	464x
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	320x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	337x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	211x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 257%, 7,746 samples	26x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2B1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 1,021 samples	129x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	117x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16