Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130 3,684 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 85.9 1-Core 79.6 2-Core 120 60% 95.2 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 213 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3086) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.46% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.9 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.46% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB 31,958 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 638GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 81 82 89 86 85 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Write 86.4 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 79.8 42% 58.1 MB/s	4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 97% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler 112 16GB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 7GB free, PID 162a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	1.91% Terrible	Read 7.7 Write 1.5 Mixed 3.7 SusWrite 1.8 4% 3.67 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.91% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6J1 Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.2% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	24.1"	1280 720	DELF017 DELL U2410

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16