HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 18:36
Run Duration364 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 170
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 328
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 10.4
10% 12.6 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 13.6
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 187 192 70 43 168 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 249
Write 217
Mixed 218
SusWrite 133
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 25.4
86% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 146
123% 179 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
68GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 166 162 160 146 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 142
Write 146
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 159
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 113%
WD WD1600HLFS-60G6U2 160GB
15GB free
Firmware: 04.04V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 58 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 53
Write 79.5
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 57.2
45% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 68%
HP External HDD 1TB
150GB free, PID 4607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 25 24 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.3% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 16.9
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 24.6
29% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 18%
IT-CEO USB2.0SATADevice 320GB
93GB free, PID 4511
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 26 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 28
Write 20.2
Mixed 19
SusWrite 26.5
31% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA1339.C16F RMR5040MM58F9F1600 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 7R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 24% 41 125 96 60 21.5" 1920 1080 BNQ78E8 BenQ GW2280
History: Score 10: 2R 0G 0B | Score 35: 7R 0G 0B | Score 30: 6R 0G 0B | Score 42: 7R 2G 1B
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback