PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110302 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 21 '21 at 17:18 |
Run Duration | 223 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
73.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maxtor S TM3160212A 160GB
15GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 34 35 37 35 MB/s
|
29%
Poor
|
|||
Maxtor 6 B120P0 123GB
44GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 34 35 36 35 MB/s
|
21.9%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 54 30 31 35 38 MB/s
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
47GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 62 68 68 68 68 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
3GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 MB/s
|
3.67%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend JM1333KLN-8GK 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | ACR06F9 QG241Y |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $127Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 70x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 38x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 38x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 21x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $165 |