Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 17:18
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 181
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 454
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 38.9
31% 39.6 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 0.1
18% 25.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor S TM3160212A 160GB
15GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 34 35 37 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 66
Write 11.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 34.8
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 36%
Maxtor 6 B120P0 123GB
44GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 34 35 36 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.9% Poor
Read 40.6
Write 44.7
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 34.8
27% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 22%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 54 30 31 35 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 78.7
Write 67.9
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 37.9
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
47GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 62 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 61.1
Write 32.5
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 66.5
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 44%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
3GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 3.5
5% 4.93 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-8GK 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.8" 1280 720 ACR06F9 QG241Y
Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback