Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory32.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 13:39
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 258
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 970
88% 738 Pts
64-Core 2,002
124% 2,002 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 193
Parallax 184
148% 186 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 186
Splatting 125
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
493GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 427 425 417 424 412 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 443
Mixed 410
SusWrite 417
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 35.6
121% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 346
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 133%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
14TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 261 242 258 251 252 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 40%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
13TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 232 235 239 263 258 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 40%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
12.5TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 120 122 119 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 40%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
6TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 184 193 205 197 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 40%
Hitachi HDN 721010ALE604 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 248 244 247 237 244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 241
Write 243
Mixed 123
SusWrite 244
156% 213 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.1
298% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%
Asmt ASM1352R-Volume 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 158 161 151 157 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 129
Write 86.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 155
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 88%
BUFFALO HD-PATU3 1TB
931GB free, PID 021c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 114 114 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 111
Write 77.9
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 112
120% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 31.5
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 9.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback