Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 01:20
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 71.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 1,010
90% 764 Pts
64-Core 2,023
125% 2,023 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 200
Parallax 191
136% 186 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 184
Splatting 122
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 451 422 458 460 457 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 452
Mixed 430
SusWrite 451
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 42.1
148% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 349
264% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Asmt ASM1352R-Volume 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 155 160 157 154 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 101
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 156
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDN 721010ALE604 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 244 246 244 247 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 248
Mixed 110
SusWrite 243
154% 210 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.1
306% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%
BUFFALO HD-PATU3 1TB
866GB free, PID 021c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 110 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 108
Write 71.1
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 109
112% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 31
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 32
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback