Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 11:50
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 87.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 237
89% 156 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 942
87% 726 Pts
64-Core 1537
95% 1537 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.4% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 70
Parallax 61.3
47% 62.9 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 54.8
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,042
Write 1222
Mixed 536
277% 1,266 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 52.6
195% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 772
595% 814 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 155 154 155 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 152
Write 149
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 154
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 86%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
24GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 94 100 94 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 72.6
Write 75
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 93.5
57% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: V8GNW410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 225 228 231 231 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 210
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 227
135% 185 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1.2
331% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 128%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avexir DDR4-2400 CL16 16GB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.5% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 24
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0B3F S22D300
Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $920
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback