Acer Aspire M5811

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M5811  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H57M01
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 23:23
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 167
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 370
42% 326 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 59.3
45% 60.6 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 52.9
48% 59 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 122 132 130 131 132 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43% Average
Read 230
Write 136
Mixed 136
SusWrite 125
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 15.6
61% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 54
72% 132 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 79%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
436GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 106 114 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 105
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
466GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 102 107 107 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 97.9
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 100
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.9% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 25% 4 105 1 60 24.1" 1920 1200 HWP3123 HP E241i
Typical Aspire M5811 Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5811

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $151
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback