| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-C/PS (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170302 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 17 '21 at 22:12 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | IRN-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.9%
Very good
|
72% 125 Pts
|
47% 349 Pts
|
22% 350 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59.9%
Above average
|
64% 76.8 fps
|
52% 63.8 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingmax GLLG42F-18KCIA------ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.6%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
33% 11.5 GB/s
|
52% 77.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 12 | 10 | 60 | 12.6" | 1280 720 | NCS2275 |
Typical H110M-C/PS Builds (Compare 64 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-C/PS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 19x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 10x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 11x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $103 |