Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '15 at 21:16
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 120
2-Core 242
82% 181 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 470
64% 476 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5850
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 60.8
53% 65.3 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 59.1
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 503
Write 422
Mixed 454
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 20.5
136% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 97.9
DQ Mixed 74.7
54% 68.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
775GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 152
Write 152
Mixed 149
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.18
82% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87%
Great: 114%
ST950032 5ASG 500GB
305GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 40.8
Mixed 12.6
37% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.29
44% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 28%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
234GB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 77.3
Write 71.1
Mixed 68.4
92% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.36
51% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 48%
Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback