MSI 760GM-P21(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GM-P21(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130428
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 04:42
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 560
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 94.7
48% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 92.8
8-Core 95.4
12% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 85.5
5% 85.5 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
MSI(1462 7641) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 2.9
1% 1.7 fps
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 158 66 141 75 134 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 194
Write 171
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 122
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 1.5
43% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 70.9
DQ Mixed 18.3
23% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 JM1333KLN-4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.3% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-P21(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P21(FX) (MS-7641)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback