Asus P11C-M Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus P11C-M Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P11C-M Series
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191025
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 04:10
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$271
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 314
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,203
107% 906 Pts
64-Core 1,527
94% 1,527 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.2% Average
Lighting 51.3
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 67.8
42% 59 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 52.2
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$57
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 961 1051 1057 1115 857 922 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,230
Write 1,058
Mixed 118
SusWrite 994
190% 850 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 68.8
228% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 731
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 480
444% 680 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 215%
Great: 311%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
671GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 1105 1110 1090 1000 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,347
Write 1,140
Mixed 948
SusWrite 930
245% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 64.9
217% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 469
418% 625 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 210%
Great: 255%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 174 176 178 178 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 139
Write 150
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 177
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 178 182 188 188 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 184
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
203% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 90%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
43GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 22 18 25 22 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 43.6
Write 34.3
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 20.5
47% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD2666U1916JG 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 22.8
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 240 24.1" 1280 720 SAM100A LC27RG50
Typical P11C-M Series Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus P11C-M Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback