Asus P6T SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P6T SE  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100308
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 16:38
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 148
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 362
39% 311 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84AC) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 21.2
17% 22.3 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 23
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 64 71 78 86 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 90.1
Write 98.8
Mixed 58
SusWrite 75.4
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 69%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
7GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 28.8
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 22.1
36% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 45%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
201GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 15 13 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 28.6
Mixed 26
SusWrite 15.1
33% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 45%
Kingston DT R400 32GB
18GB free, PID 1687
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 13 8.6 19 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
9.84% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 15.6
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 17
21% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback