Aftershock Apex 15 lite

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAftershock Apex 15 lite  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 16:09
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 111
2-Core 255
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 641
62% 509 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.7% Good
Lighting 87.3
Reflection 95.9
Parallax 80.3
71% 87.8 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 72.7
67% 83.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASE12NVME512 512GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 828
Mixed 123
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 41.8
137% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,058
DQ Write 670
DQ Mixed 786
607% 838 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 222%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
193GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 62 63 64 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 81.5
Write 42.8
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 64.2
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GS88N26-JJJHA0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 22.4
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 25.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Apex 15 lite Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock Apex 15 lite

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback