Aftershock Apex 15 lite

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAftershock Apex 15 lite  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 19:04
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 526
60% 472 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.3% Good
Lighting 76.3
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 66.4
62% 52.7 fps
MRender 92.1
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 67.9
63% 77.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASE12NVME512 512GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 523
Write 1485
Mixed 746
209% 918 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 52.7
169% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,089
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 422
436% 723 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 222%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 48 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 88.7
Write 74.5
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 74.6
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GS88N26-JJJHA0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 22.5
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Apex 15 lite Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock Apex 15 lite

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback