Aftershock Apex 15 lite

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAftershock Apex 15 lite  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 22:34
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 253
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 599
64% 512 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6611
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (61 fps cap detected)
45.6% Average
Lighting 60.2
Reflection 60.2
Parallax 45.4
49% 55.3 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 61
39% 44.6 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASE12NVME512 512GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 446
Write 1,538
Mixed 285
172% 756 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 44.8
149% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 710
532% 717 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 222%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 79 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 87.9
Write 78.6
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 79.4
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
153% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GS88N26-JJJHA0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Apex 15 lite Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock Apex 15 lite

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback